EGFR-mediated hyperacetylation of tubulin induced docetaxel resistance by downregulation of HDAC6 and upregulation of MCAK and PLK1 in prostate cancer cells.

Docetaxel-based chemotherapy has generally been considered as one of the effective treatments for castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa). However, clinical treatment with docetaxel often encounters a number of undesirable effects, including drug resistance. Tubulin isoforms have been previously examined for their resistance to docetaxel in many cancers, but their real mechanisms remained unclear. In this study, a series of docetaxel-resistant PC/DX cell sublines were established by chronically exposing PC3 to progressively increased concentrations of docetaxel. Western blotting results showed significantly higher expression of acetyl-tubulin, α-tubulin, ß-tubulin, γ-tubulin, and ßIII-tubulin in PC/DX25 than in parental PC3 cells. PC/DX25 with greater resistance to docetaxel had higher levels of acetyl-tubulin and mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK) than PC3 cells. This study found that docetaxel induced the expression of acetyl-tubulin and MCAK in PC3 cells at a dose- and time-dependent manner. Both mRNA and protein levels of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) were significantly decreased in PC/DX25 compared with PC3 cells. PC3 increased the resistance to docetaxel by HDAC6 knockdown and Tubastatin A (HDAC6 inhibitor). Conversely, PC/DX25 reversed the sensitivity to docetaxel by MCAK knockdown. Notably, flow cytometry analysis revealed that MCAK knockdown induced significantly sub G1 fraction in PC/DX cells. Overexpression of polo-like kinase-1 increased the cell survival rate and resistance to docetaxel in PC3 cells. Moreover, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation induced the upregulation of acetyl-tubulin in docetaxel-resistant PCa cells. These findings demonstrated that the EGFR-mediated upregulated expression of acetyl-tubulin played an important role in docetaxel-resistant PCa.

The crescent-like Golgi ribbon is shaped by the Ajuba/PRMT5/Aurora-A complex-modified HURP.

BACKGROUND: Golgi apparatus (GA) is assembled as a crescent-like ribbon in mammalian cells under immunofluorescence microscope without knowing the shaping mechanisms. It is estimated that roughly 1/5 of the genes encoding kinases or phosphatases in human genome participate in the assembly of Golgi ribbon, reflecting protein modifications play major roles in building Golgi ribbon. METHODS: To explore how Golgi ribbon is shaped as a crescent-like structure under the guidance of protein modifications, we identified a protein complex containing the scaffold proteins Ajuba, two known GA regulators including the protein kinase Aurora-A and the protein arginine methyltransferase PRMT5, and the common substrate of Aurora-A and PRMT5, HURP. Mutual modifications and activation of PRMT5 and Aurora-A in the complex leads to methylation and in turn phosphorylation of HURP, thereby producing HURP p725. The HURP p725 localizes to GA vicinity and its distribution pattern looks like GA morphology. Correlation study of the HURP p725 statuses and GA structure, site-directed mutagenesis and knockdown-rescue experiments were employed to identify the modified HURP as a key regulator assembling GA as a crescent ribbon. RESULTS: The cells containing no or extended distribution of HURP p725 have dispersed GA membranes or longer GA. Knockdown of HURP fragmentized GA and HURP wild type could, while its phosphorylation deficiency mutant 725A could not, restore crescent Golgi ribbon in HURP depleted cells, collectively indicating a crescent GA-constructing activity of HURP p725. HURP p725 is transported, by GA membrane-associated ARF1, Dynein and its cargo adaptor Golgin-160, to cell center where HURP p725 forms crescent fibers, binds and stabilizes Golgi assembly factors (GAFs) including TRIP11, GRASP65 and GM130, thereby dictating the formation of crescent Golgi ribbon at nuclear periphery. CONCLUSIONS: The Ajuba/PRMT5/Aurora-A complex integrates the signals of protein methylation and phosphorylation to HURP, and the HURP p725 organizes GA by stabilizing and recruiting GAFs to its crescent-like structure, therefore shaping GA as a crescent ribbon. Therefore, the HURP p725 fiber serves a template to construct GA according to its shape. Video Abstract.

The JMJD6/HURP axis promotes cell migration via NF-κB-dependent centrosome repositioning and Cdc42-mediated Golgi repositioning.

Golgi apparatus (GA) and centrosome reposition toward cell leading end during directional cell migration in a coupling way, thereby determining cell polarity by transporting essential factors to the proximal plasma membrane. The study provides mechanistic insights into how GA repositioning (GR) is regulated, and how GR and centrosome repositioning (CR) are coupled. Our previous published works reveals that PRMT5 methylates HURP at R122 and the HURP m122 inhibits GR and cell migration by stabilizing GA-associated acetyl-tubulin and then rigidifying GA. The current study further shows that the demethylase JMJD6-guided demethylation of HURP at R122 promotes GR and cell migration. The HURP methylation mimicking mutant 122 F blocks JMJD6-induced GR and cell migration, suggesting JMJD6 relays GR stimulating signal to HURP. Mechanistic studies reveal that the HURP methylation deficiency mutant 122 K promotes GR through NF-κB-induced CR and subsequently CR-dependent Cdc42 upregulation, where Cdc42 couples CR to GR. Taken together, HURP methylation statuses provide a unique opportunity to understand how GR is regulated, and the GA intrinsic mechanism controlling Golgi rigidity and the GA extrinsic mechanism involving NF-κB-CR-Cdc42 cascade collectively dictate GR.

The PRMT5/HURP axis retards Golgi repositioning by stabilizing acetyl-tubulin and Golgi apparatus during cell migration.

The Golgi apparatus (GA) translocates to the cell leading end during directional migration, thereby determining cell polarity and transporting essential factors to the migration apparatus. The study provides mechanistic insights into how GA repositioning (GR) is regulated. We show that the methyltransferase PRMT5 methylates the microtubule regulator HURP at R122. The HURP methylation mimicking mutant 122F impairs GR and cell migration. Mechanistic studies revealed that HURP 122F or endogenous methylated HURP, that is, HURP m122, interacts with acetyl-tubulin. Overexpression of HURP 122F stabilizes the bundling pattern of acetyl-tubulin by decreasing the sensitivity of the latter to a microtubule disrupting agent nocodazole. HURP 122F also rigidifies GA via desensitizing the organelle to several GA disrupting chemicals. Similarly, the acetyl-tubulin mimicking mutant 40Q or tubulin acetyltransferase αTAT1 can rigidify GA, impair GR, and retard cell migration. Reversal of HURP 122F-induced GA rigidification, by knocking down GA assembly factors such as GRASP65 or GM130, attenuates 122F-triggered GR and cell migration. Remarkably, PRMT5 is found downregulated and the level of HURP m122 is decreased during the early hours of wound healing-based cell migration, collectively implying that the PRMT5-HURP-acetyl-tubulin axis plays the role of brake, preventing GR and cell migration before cells reach empty space.

Exerting the Appropriate Application of Methylprednisolone in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Based on Time Course Transcriptomics Analysis.

Methylprednisolone (MP) is an anti-inflammatory drug approved for the treatment of acute spinal cord injuries (SCIs). However, MP administration for SCIs has become a controversial issue while the molecular effects of MP remain unexplored to date. Therefore, delineating the benefits and side effects of MP and determining what MP cannot cure in SCIs at the molecular level are urgent issues. Here, genomic profiles of the spinal cord in rats with and without injury insults, and those with and without MP treatment, were generated at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h post-injury. A comprehensive analysis was applied to obtain three distinct classes: side effect of MP (SEMP), competence of MP (CPMP), and incapability of MP (ICMP). Functional analysis using these genes suggested that MP exerts its greatest effect at 8~12 h, and the CPMP was reflected in the immune response, while SEMP suggested aspects of metabolism, such as glycolysis, and ICMP was on neurological system processes in acute SCIs. For the first time, we are able to precisely reveal responsive functions of MP in SCIs at the molecular level and provide useful solutions to avoid complications of MP in SCIs before better therapeutic drugs are available.

Cytotoxicity of naringenin induces Bax-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells.

Naringenin (NGEN), a natural flavonoid has growth inhibition and apoptosis-inducing activities in several cancer cells. However, the cytotoxicity mechanisms of NGEN in cell death of lung cancer cells have not been fully defined. In present study, treatment of human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells with NGEN resulted in time- and dose-dependent decreases in cell viability. Moreover, NGEN significantly induced apoptosis evidenced by morphological changes, DAPI staining, TUNEL assay and sub-G1 population increase. In NGEN-treated cells, intensely upregulated Bax and down-regulated Bcl-2 proteins were detected and the Bax protein associated with the mitochondrial membrane was analyzed by subcellular fractionation. Knockdown of the Bax expression by the shRNA method dramatically protected A549 cells against NGEN-induced apoptosis. Treatment with the inhibitors of caspase-3, -8, or -9 significantly reduced NGEN-induced apoptotic deaths. Taken together, our results demonstrate that NGEN-induced apoptosis may occur via a Bax-activated mitochondrial pathway in lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells.

Enolase 1 differentially contributes to cell transformation in lung cancer but not in esophageal cancer.

Enolase transforms 2-phospho-D-glycerate into phosphoenolpyruvate during glycolysis. The human enolase (ENO) family comprises three members named ENO3, which is restricted to muscle tissues, ENO2, which is neuron- and neuroendocrine tissue-specific, and ENO1, which is expressed in almost all tissues. ENO1 is involved in various types of human cancer, including retinoblastoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, renal cell carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma and gastric cancer. Furthermore, ENO1 enhances cell transformation in numerous cancer cell lines. It has been reported that ENO1 is involved in various activities that are detrimental to cell transformation, including apoptosis and differentiation. However, a few studies demonstrated that ENO1 can be down- or upregulated in various types of lung cancer, which suggests that ENO1 has an ambiguous role in the development of lung cancer. The present study aimed to investigate the differential influences of ENO1 on various types of cancer, and to clarify the role of ENO1 in lung cancer in particular. Western blotting was performed to assess ENO1 protein expression levels in lung cancer and esophageal cancer tissues. Furthermore, exogenous ENO1 was overexpressed in cell lines derived from various tissues and single cell proliferation, flowcytometric analysis, and western blotting were performed to determine the cell proliferation rate, cell transformation status, cell cycle progression and the expression of cell cycle regulators, such as cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases, and survival factors, such as MAPK and AKT. The results demonstrated that ENO1 was upregulated in collected panels of lung cancer tissues, but not in esophageal cancer tissues. In addition, overexpression of ectopic ENO1 promoted cell proliferation and survival in lung cancer cell lines, which was not the case in other cells, including an esophageal cell line. Furthermore, mechanistic analyses revealed that ENO1 enhanced cell proliferation by accelerating G1 progression and upregulating G1 phase cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6), and improved cell survival by upregulating p38 in the MAPK cascade and increasing p-AKT in the AKT cascade, in particular in lung cancer cell lines. Overall, the results from the present study demonstrated that ENO1 may contribute to the development of lung cancers, but not esophageal cancers.

Differential contribution of protein phosphatase 1α to cell transformation of different cell types.

Protein phosphorylation plays roles in cell transformation. Numerous protein kinase enzymes actively participate in the formation of various types of cancer by phosphorylating downstream substrates. Aurora­A is a widely known Serine/Threonine (Ser/Thr) oncogenic kinase, which is upregulated in more than twenty types of human cancer. This enzyme phosphorylates a wide range of substrates. For example, Aurora­A induces cell transformation by phosphorylating hepatoma upregulated protein (HURP) at four serine residues, which in turn decreases the phosphorylated levels of cell­growth suppressive Jun N­terminal kinase (p­JNK). Various protein phosphatase enzymes are considered tumor suppressors by the dephosphorylation and consequent inactivation of their oncogenic substrates. Protein phosphatase 1α (PP1α), for instance, acts on Aurora­A by dephosphorylating its substrates. However, the role of PP1α in cancer progression remains ambiguous. PP1α is overexpressed in several cancer tissues, and induces cell apoptosis and differentiation or it inhibits tumor formation in other types of cells. In addition, positive and negative correlations between PP1α expression and lung cancer development have been documented. These observations suggest the differential regulation of PP1α in various cancer tissues, or propose an ambiguous contribution of PP1α to lung cancer development. In order to investigate these contradictory conclusions, it was reported that the chromosomal region covering the PP1α locus was subjected to DNA alterations, such as gain or loss in various human cancer types by a study based on literature search. Upregulation of PP1α was noted in a collection of lung cancer tissues, and was required for the cell transformation of the lung cancer cell line A549. In contrast to this finding, overexpression of ectopic PP1α inhibited cell proliferation in 293T cells. Mechanistic studies revealed that PP1α activated AKT in A549 cells, whereas it further inactivated AKT and disrupted the HURP/JNK signaling cascade in 293T cells. Collectively, the data indicated that PP1α exerted an oncogenic function in lung cancer, while exhibiting various effects on cell transformation in different types of cells via distinct or opposite mechanisms.

Overexpression of Aurora-A bypasses cytokinesis through phosphorylation of suppressed in lung cancer.

Mitosis is a complicated process by which eukaryotic cells segregate duplicated genomes into two daughter cells. To achieve the goal, numerous regulators have been revealed to control mitosis. The oncogenic Aurora-A is a versatile kinase responsible for the regulation of mitosis including chromosome condensation, spindle assembly, and centrosome maturation through phosphorylating a range of substrates. However, overexpression of Aurora-A bypasses cytokinesis, thereby generating multiple nuclei by unknown the mechanisms. To explore the underlying mechanisms, we found that SLAN, a potential tumor suppressor, served as a substrate of Aurora-A and knockdown of SLAN induced immature cytokinesis. Aurora-A phosphorylates SLAN at T573 under the help of the scaffold protein 14-3-3η. The SLAN phosphorylation-mimicking mutants T573D or T573E, in contrast to the phosphorylation-deficiency mutant T573A, induced higher level of multinucleated cells, and the endogenous SLAN p573 resided at spindle midzone and midbody with the help of the microtubule motor MKLP1. The Aurora-A- or SLAN-induced multiple nuclei was prevented by the knockdown of 14-3-3η or Aurora-A respectively, thereby revealing a 14-3-3η/Aurora-A/SLAN cascade negatively controlling cytokinesis. Intriguingly, SLAN T573D or T573E inactivated and T573A activated the key cytokinesis regulator RhoA. RhoA interacted with SLAN np573, i.e., the nonphosphorylated form of SLAN at T573, which localized to the spindle midzone dictated by RhoA and ECT2. Therefore, we report here that SLAN mediates the Aurora-A-triggered cytokinesis bypass and SLAN plays dual roles in that process depending on its phosphorylation status.

Arecoline Promotes Migration of A549 Lung Cancer Cells through Activating the EGFR/Src/FAK Pathway.

Arecoline is the primary alkaloid in betel nuts, which are known as a risk factor for oral submucosal fibrosis and oral cancer. Lung cancer is a severe type of carcinoma with high cell motility that is difficult to treat. However, the detailed mechanisms of the correlation between Arecoline and lung cancer are not fully understood. Here, we investigated the effect of Arecoline on migration in lung cancer cell lines and its potential mechanism through the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor 3 (mAChR3)-triggered EGFR/Src/FAK pathway. Our results indicate that different concentrations of Arecoline treatment (10 µM, 20 µM, and 40 µM) significantly increased the cell migration ability in A549 and CL1-0 cells and promoted the formation of the filamentous actin (F-actin) cytoskeleton, which is a crucial element for cell migration. However, migration of H460, CL1-5, and H520 cell lines, which have a higher migration ability, was not affected by Arecoline treatment. The EGFR/c-Src/Fak pathway, which is responsible for cell migration, was activated by Arecoline treatment, and a decreased expression level of E-cadherin, which is an epithelial marker, was observed in Arecoline-treated cell lines. Blockade of the EGFR/c-Src/Fak pathway with the inhibitors of EGFR (Gefitinib) or c-Src (Dasatinib) significantly prevented Arecoline-promoted migration in A549 cells. Gefitinib or Dasatinib treatment significantly disrupted the Arecoline-induced localization of phospho-Y576-Fak during focal adhesion in A549 cells. Interestingly, Arecoline-promoted migration in A549 cells was blocked by a specific mAChR3 inhibitor (4-DAMP) or a neutralizing antibody of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP7 or Matrilysin). Taken together, our findings suggest that mAChR3 might play an essential role in Arecoline-promoted EGFR/c-Src/Fak activation and migration in an A549 lung cancer cell line.

Fabrication and characterization of distinctive ZnO/ZnS core-shell structures on silicon substrates via a hydrothermal method.

A distinctive novel ZnO/ZnS core-shell structure on silicon was reported in this study. Compared with previous studies, ZnO nanorods encapsulated by 5 nm ZnS nanograins were observed using a scanning electron microscope. Furthermore, strong (111) cubic ZnS crystalline structures were confirmed using high resolution transmission electron microscopy, selected area diffraction, and X-ray diffraction. The optical properties changed and the antibacterial behaviors were suppressed as the ZnS shells were attached onto the ZnO nanorods. Moreover, the results also indicate that the hydrophobicity could be enhanced as more ZnS nanograins were wrapped onto the ZnO nanorods. The ZnO/ZnS core-shell structures in this research show promise for use in future optoelectronic and biomedical applications.

Aurora A and NF-κB Survival Pathway Drive Chemoresistance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia via the TRAF-Interacting Protein TIFA.

Aurora A-dependent NF-κB signaling portends poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other cancers, but the functional basis underlying this association is unclear. Here, we report that Aurora A is essential for Thr9 phosphorylation of the TRAF-interacting protein TIFA, triggering activation of the NF-κB survival pathway in AML. TIFA protein was overexpressed concurrently with Aurora A and NF-κB signaling factors in patients with de novo AML relative to healthy individuals and also correlated with poor prognosis. Silencing TIFA in AML lines and primary patient cells decreased leukemic cell growth and chemoresistance via downregulation of prosurvival factors Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL that support NF-κB-dependent antiapoptotic events. Inhibiting TIFA perturbed leukemic cytokine secretion and reduced the IC50 of chemotherapeutic drug treatments in AML cells. Furthermore, in vivo delivery of TIFA-inhibitory fragments potentiated the clearance of myeloblasts in the bone marrow of xenograft-recipient mice via enhanced chemotoxicity. Collectively, our results showed that TIFA supports AML progression and that its targeting can enhance the efficacy of AML treatments. Cancer Res; 77(2); 494-508. ©2016 AACR.

The involvement of nuclear factor-κappaB in the nuclear targeting and cyclin E1 upregulating activities of hepatoma upregulated protein.

Hepatoma upregulated protein (HURP) is originally isolated during the search for the genes associated with hepatoma. HURP is upregulated in many human cancers. Culture cells exhibit transformed and invasive phenotype when ectopic HURP is introduced, revealing HURP as an oncogene candidate. Our previous studies demonstrated that Aurora-A regulated the cell transforming activities of HURP by phosphorylating HURP at four serines. To unravel how the Aurora-A/HURP cascade contributes to cell transformation, we firstly noticed that HURP shuttled between cytoplasm and nucleus. The nuclear localization activity of HURP was promoted or abolished by overexpression or knockdown of Aurora-A. Similarly, the HURP phosphorylation mimicking mutant 4E had higher nuclear targeting activity than the phosphorylation deficient mutant 4A. The HURP 4E accelerated G1 progression and upregulated cyclin E1, and the cyclin E1 upregulating and cell transforming activities of HURP were diminished when the nuclear localization signal (NLS) was removed from HURP. Furthermore, HURP employed p38/nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) cascade to stimulate cell growth. Interestingly, NF-κB trapped HURP in nucleus by interacting with HURP 4E. At last, the HURP/NF-κB complex activated the cyclin E1 promoter. Collectively, Aurora-A/HURP relays cell transforming signal to NF-κB, and the HURP/NF-κB complex is engaged in the regulation of cyclin E1 expression.

Methylosome protein 50 promotes androgen- and estrogen-independent tumorigenesis.

Methylosome protein 50 (MEP50) is a component of methylosome where MEP50 binds protein substrates and activates the oncogenic protein arginine methyl transferase 5 (PRMT5). MEP50 is also a coactivator for androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor (ER), and transforms cells in the presence of androgen or estrogen. To extend the understanding of how MEP50 transforms cells, we investigated whether MEP50 could transform cells independent of AR and ER, and clarified whether PRMT5 could contribute to the MEP50-caused tumor formation. Microarray and Western blot analyses revealed the association of MEP50 with many human cancers including lung cancer. Knockdown of MEP50 retarded cell growth and migration in selected lung cancer cell lines, which expressed very low level of AR and ER and were insensitive to inhibitors of AR and ER. Moreover, overexpression of Myc-MEP50 enhanced cell transforming activities of 293T cells which are known lack of expression of AR and ER. Mechanistic analyses showed that MEP50 controlled G2 progression, upregulated cyclin-dependent kinase 1(CDK1)/cyclin B1, and activated the survival cascade Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT. MEP50 promoted cell migration, and activated the cell migration pathways such as Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1)/vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), and forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2)/slug/cadherin cascades. Further analyses revealed that MEP50 activated the survival factor PI3K through PRMT5-catalyzed dimethylation of PI3K. Collectively, it is concluded that MEP50 can transform cells independent of AR and ER, and PRMT5 has partial contribution to that process.

The mitosis-regulating and protein-protein interaction activities of astrin are controlled by aurora-A-induced phosphorylation.

Cells display dramatic morphological changes in mitosis, where numerous factors form regulatory networks to orchestrate the complicated process, resulting in extreme fidelity of the segregation of duplicated chromosomes into two daughter cells. Astrin regulates several aspects of mitosis, such as maintaining the cohesion of sister chromatids by inactivating Separase and stabilizing spindle, aligning and segregating chromosomes, and silencing spindle assembly checkpoint by interacting with Src kinase-associated phosphoprotein (SKAP) and cytoplasmic linker-associated protein-1α (CLASP-1α). To understand how Astrin is regulated in mitosis, we report here that Astrin acts as a mitotic phosphoprotein, and Aurora-A phosphorylates Astrin at Ser(115). The phosphorylation-deficient mutant Astrin S115A abnormally activates spindle assembly checkpoint and delays mitosis progression, decreases spindle stability, and induces chromosome misalignment. Mechanistic analyses reveal that Astrin phosphorylation mimicking mutant S115D, instead of S115A, binds and induces ubiquitination and degradation of securin, which sequentially activates Separase, an enzyme required for the separation of sister chromatids. Moreover, S115A fails to bind mitosis regulators, including SKAP and CLASP-1α, which results in the mitotic defects observed in Astrin S115A-transfected cells. In conclusion, Aurora-A phosphorylates Astrin and guides the binding of Astrin to its cellular partners, which ensures proper progression of mitosis.

Effector mechanisms of sunitinib-induced G1 cell cycle arrest, differentiation, and apoptosis in human acute myeloid leukaemia HL60 and KG-1 cells.

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease with dismal outcome. Sunitinib is an orally active inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinase receptors approved for renal cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumour that has also been studied for AML in several clinical trials. However, the precise mechanism of sunitinib action against AML remains unclear and requires further investigation. For this purpose, this study was conducted using human AML cell lines (HL60 and KG-1) and AML patients' mononucleated cells. Sunitinib induced G1 phase arrest associated with decreased cyclin D1, cyclin D3, and cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk)2 and increased p27(Kip1), pRb1, and p130/Rb2 expression and phosphorylated activation of protein kinase C alpha and beta (PKCα/ß). Selective PKCα/ß inhibitor treatment abolished sunitinib-elicited AML differentiation, suggesting that PKCα/ß may underlie sunitinib-induced monocytic differentiation. Furthermore, sunitinib increased pro-apoptotic molecule expression (Bax, Bak, PUMA, Fas, FasL, DR4, and DR5) and decreased anti-apoptotic molecule expression (Bcl-2 and Mcl-1), resulting in caspase-2, caspase-3, caspase-8, and caspase-9 activation and both death receptor and mitochondria-dependent apoptosis. Taken together, these findings provide evidence that sunitinib targets AML cells through both differentiation and apoptosis pathways. More clinical studies are urgently needed to demonstrate its optimal clinical applications in AML.

p53 negatively regulates Aurora A via both transcriptional and posttranslational regulation.

p53 plays an important role in mitotic checkpoint, but what its role is remains enigmatic. Aurora A is a Ser/Thr kinase involved in correcting progression of mitosis. Here, we show that p53 is a negative regulator for Aurora A. We found that p53 deficiency leads to Aurora A elevation. Ectopic expression of p53 or DNA damage-induced expression of p53 can suppress the expression of Aurora A. Mechanistic studies show that p53 is a negative regulator for Aurora A expression through both transcriptional and posttranslational regulation. p53 knockdown in cancer cells reduces the level of p21, which, in turn, increases the activity of CDK2 followed by induction of Rb1 hyperphosphorylation and its dissociation with transcriptional factor E2F3. E2F3 can bind to Aurora A gene promoter, potentiating Aurora A gene expression and p53 deficiency, enhancing the binding of E2F3 on Aurora A promoter. Also, p53 deficiency leads to decelerating Aurora A's turnover rate, due to the fact that p53 deficiency causes the downregulation of Fbw7α, a component of E3 ligase of Aurora A. Consistently, p53 knockdown-mediated Aurora A elevation is mitigated when Fbw7α is ectopically expressed. Thus, p53-mediated Aurora A degradation requires Fbw7α expression. Significantly, inverse correlation between p53 and Aurora A elevation is translated into the deregulation of centrosome amplification. p53 knockdown leads to high percentages of cells with abnormal amplification of centrosome. These data suggest that p53 is an important negative regulator of Aurora A, and that loss of p53 in many types of cancer could lead to abnormal elevation of Aurora A and dysregulated mitosis, which provides a growth advantage for cancer cells.

The novel protein suppressed in lung cancer down-regulated in lung cancer tissues retards cell proliferation and inhibits the oncokinase Aurora-A.

INTRODUCTION: In an attempt to search for genes with abnormal expression in cancers, Suppressed in Lung Cancer (SLAN, also known as KIAA0256) is found underexpressed in human lung cancer tissues by quantitative real-time PCR (Q-RT-PCR). The study set out to characterize SLAN protein and explore its cellular functions. METHODS: SLAN or its specific short hairpin RNA, full length or various deletion mutants were overexpressed in 293T or lung cancer cell lines, and cell proliferation, cell cycle, mitosis progression, and spindle configuration were surveyed. RESULTS: SLAN and its deletion mutants are localized to many subcellular locations such as endoplasmic reticulum (ER), nucleus, nucleolus, spindle pole and midbody, suggesting SLAN may function as a multifunctional protein. Overexpression of SLAN per se or its short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) inhibits or accelerates cell proliferation through prolonging or shortening mitosis. Time-lapse microscopic recording reveals that cells overexpressing exogenous SLAN are arrested in mitosis or cannot undergo cytokinesis. SLAN 2-551 mutants drastically arrest cells in mitosis, where α- and γ-tubulin are disorganized. SLAN employs C-terminal to interact with Aurora-A, a key mitosis regulator and an oncogenic kinase associated with a wide range of human cancers. SLAN negatively regulates the activity of Aurora-A by directly inhibiting kinase activity in vitro or reducing the level of active Aurora-A in cells. SLAN is frequently reduced in lung cancer tissues overexpressing Aurora-A, arguing for the necessity to suppress SLAN during the Aurora-A-associated cancer formation. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, we have identified a novel protein SLAN downregulated in lung caner, having multiple subcellular localization including spindle matrix and midbody, inhibiting cell proliferation and Aurora-A.

Aurora-A promotes gefitinib resistance via a NF-κB signaling pathway in p53 knockdown lung cancer cells.

Mutations of the p53 tumor suppressor gene are the most common mutations found in human tumors. There is increasing evidence that suggests that p53 status is a determinant of chemosensitivity of tumor cells. We have previously demonstrated that p53 is a crucial regulator in mediating gefitinib-induced cell death, which upregulates apoptosis-related molecules. However, the mechanism of p53 involvement in cellular resistance to gefitinib remains unclear. In this study, we found that human non-small cell lung cancer cells, A549, with wild-type p53 exhibited a low level of Aurora-A expression and were sensitive to treatment with gefitinib. p53-knockdown A549 cells exhibited a high level of Aurora-A expression and were resistant to gefitinib-mediated apoptosis induction. In addition, the silencing of Aurora-A expression using an Aurora-A specific siRNA in p53-knockdown cells sensitized the A549 cancer cells to gefitinib-mediated apoptosis, suggesting a role for Aurora-A in gefitinib resistance. The activation of Aurora-A was accompanied by destabilization of IκBα and an increase in NF-κB transcriptional activity and was correlated with gefitinib resistance. Conversely, knockdown of Aurora-A with a siRNA stabilized IκB protein suppressed NF-κB activation and reduced gefitinib resistance. Additionally, ectopic expression of an active form of Aurora-A increased the degradation of IκB, the activation of NF-κB and the enhancement of gefitinib resistance in comparison with parental cells. These results suggest that Aurora-A is potentially involved in promoting gefitinib resistance via the activation of NF-κB pathway. Our findings also suggest that p53 not only stimulates apoptosis-related event but also inhibits the drug-resistance ability of Aurora-A, and consequently promotes the gefitinib-induced cellular apoptotic process.

An epidermal growth factor inhibitor, Gefitinib, induces apoptosis through a p53-dependent upregulation of pro-apoptotic molecules and downregulation of anti-apoptotic molecules in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells.

A selective epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, Gefitinib, has been clinically demonstrated to be effective for certain cancer cell types including lung cancer. Our previous study indicated that Gefitinib induced Fas/caspase-dependent apoptosis in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells. However, the pathway relaying the signals of Gefitinib-induced cell death has not been fully elucidated. Loss of normal function of p53 facilitates the development of neoplastic lesions and possibly contributes to the development of resistance to chemotherapy. Thus, the current study was designed to examine the role of p53 in Gefitinib-induced apoptosis. Incubation of human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells with 25 microM Gefitinib resulted in phosphorylation and activation of p53 such as enhanced DNA binding activity, which was accompanied by the upregulation of PUMA (p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis) and Fas, and downregulation of survivin and XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein). The Gefitinib-mediated Fas, PUMA, survivin, XIAP regulation and subsequent apoptosis were significantly inhibited in stable p53-shRNA transfectants. Similarly, H1299/p53 cells were more sensitive to Gefitinib compared to H1299 cells in clonogenic survival assay. This event was accompanied by p53 phosphorylation, as well as Fas, PUMA, survivin, and XIAP modulation. Collectively, the results support an important role of p53 in Gefitinib-induced apoptosis in human lung cancer cells. p53 may induce apoptosis through the regulation of apoptotic (Fas and PUMA) and anti-apoptotic (XIAP and survivin) genes. Our studies not only pave a way to the understanding of pharmacological mechanisms of Gefitinib, but also implicate for the necessity to prescreen p53 expression level before clinical application of Gefitinib in human cancer therapy.